2012-10-07 12:55:18 / Fuente: Hispantv.com
“El drone debe haber venido desde un portaaviones americano perteneciente a su fuerza aérea o de las bases militares en Arabia Saudita, o bien de las bases estadounidenses. Esa es la única posibilidad que hasta ahora sabemos tras la investigación”, dijo el exgeneral libanés, Hisham Jaber.
El ejército israelí, mediante un comunicado publicado el sábado, anunció de que su fuerzas aéreas ha derribado a las 10:00 hora local (8.00 GMT) un vehículo aéreo no tripulado al detectarlo sobrevolando el norte del desierto del Negev, en el sur de los territorios ocupados palestinos.
El comunicado agregó que los soldados israelíes están llevando a cabo las operaciones de búsqueda en la zona para localizar e identificar los restos del drone.
Según las declaraciones de Jaber, en el caso de que el régimen de Tel Aviv mantenga el silencio y cierre el archivo después de las investigaciones, eso significaría que se trató de un envío “erróneo” por parte de un país aliado (por los americanos)”, zanjó el militar libanés.
1 Comentarios / Comenta esta artículo:
yang ziDecember 19, 2011 at 2:41 amsay there are 30 people, one big wok of rice, the rice is enuogh to let everyone have a full bowl of rice, and with some left overs still in the wok but not enuogh for all 30 to have the second bowl of rice. who ever finishes first bowl, can get second bowl on the first come first served basis.assuming you are one of 30, what is your strategy to get eat most rice?Liang1a fool, please follow the parameters of the game. there is only one wok of rice, how do you win? this game teaches you strategy and ability to think, which is what you are lacking (none of your answers are right). you are a robot who only knows one plus one equals to two. anyway, it is a waste of time to knock your 木鱼脑袋。 Liang's response:Only a depraved piece of garbage would think of getting the most for himself. A truly wise man would not think of just getting the most for himself at the expense of his group but for making it possible for all members of his group to get more. yang zi, in giving this example, shows himself to be a selfish narrow minded man who has no large vision and benevolence. He can only think of fighting his own people like a bunch of hungry dogs and think nothing of how to unite the group and cooperate for the benefit of the group as a whole so that all can get more. His type of cunningness runs only to self-benefit at the expense of the group. No matter how cunning people like these are, they can never increase the wealth of the group. They can only rise over the miseries of others. This is the problem of China with too many comprador traitors who can only think of betraying the national interests of the Chinese nation for their own selfish interest. They shamelessly sell out China so that they can get more for themselves while the rest of the Chinese people sink into abject poverty. They call that cleverness.
tuYWWMaKTMAGe
